Email this page Print-Friendly PDF
Print this page

Related Practices


To subscribe to receive Goodwin Procter alerts and publications click here

FinCEN Seeks Comment on Proposal to Amend the Definitions of “Funds Transfer” and “Transmittal of Funds”

FinCEN issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend the definitions of “funds transfer” and “transmittal of funds” under the regulations implementing the Bank Secrecy Act, in light of recent amendments to the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and its implementing regulation, Regulation E. Under the current BSA regulations, namely the Recordkeeping and Travel Rules which impose certain recordkeeping and reporting requirements on funds transfers and transmittal of funds of $3,000 or more, transactions governed by the EFTA are excluded from the definitions of “transmittal of funds” and “funds transfer.” When the BSA regulations were initially implemented, the exclusion of EFTA-covered transactions worked because the EFTA only covered certain electronic funds transfers, and the BSA and EFTA had different goals—recordkeeping and reporting, and consumer protection, respectively.

The Dodd-Frank Act amended the EFTA to include consumer protections for remittance transfers, which are broadly defined to include transactions that typically were governed by the BSA.  Thus, under the current regulatory framework, these transactions would no longer be subject to the Recordkeeping and Travel Rules’ requirements.  Accordingly, FinCEN’s proposed rule seeks to modify the definitions of “funds transfers” and “transmittal of funds” to exclude electronic fund transfers as defined in Section 903(a)(7) of the EFTA.  The proposed change would allow remittance transfers that do not meet the definition of electronic fund transfer to remain in the regulatory domain of the BSA.

At issue is the effect recent amendments to the EFTA will have the transactions historically governed by the BSA.  Specifically, the Dodd-Frank Act amended the EFTA to include a broad definition of “remittance transfers,” such that certain transactions, such as international funds transfers sent by consumers through banks and cash-based or account-based transmittal of funds sent by consumers through money transmitters will no longer be considered “funds transfer” and “transmittal of funds” under the BSA.  Comments on the proposed rule must be received by January 25, 2013.

© 2014 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved. This informational piece, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Goodwin Procter LLP, Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP or their attorneys. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcome.

Goodwin Procter LLP is a limited liability partnership which operates in the United States and has a principal law office located at 53 State Street, Boston, MA 02109. Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP is a separate limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC362294. Its registered office is at Tower 42, 25 Old Broad Street, London EC2N 1HQ. A list of the names of the members of Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP is available for inspection at the registered office. Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP is authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this informational piece (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.