Meet the firm's Business Litigation Partners
VIDEO: Avoiding Accidental Trade Secret Litigation (Dumont)
ALERT: OFAC Issues New Foreign Sanctions Evaders List (Matheny)
LAW360: Female Powerbrokers Q&A: Goodwin Procter's Brenda Sharton
PRACTICAL LAW: Mock Jury Exercises (Fetouh)
ALERT: Amendments to CalOPPA Enter Into Force Imposing New Requirements for Online Privacy Policies (Sharton)
BNA: D.C. Circuit to Decide Validity of SEC Conflict Minerals Rule, But Companies Should Consider Preliminary Steps to Comply (Giannotto)
ALERT: Release of Names With Interests in Offshore Entities: Ramifications (Sharton)
To subscribe to receive Goodwin Procter alerts and publications click here.
Clients often ask whether all those “boilerplate” clauses at the end of a commercial contract are really necessary, and if so, why can’t they just be copied and pasted from earlier agreements. This article will focus on just one such clause, the “forum selection” clause, and hopefully persuade you that such clauses are critical and require careful consideration from lawyers and clients alike.
The Benefits of Choosing Your Forum
Let’s use an example to set the stage: imagine you are a business in New York and have just negotiated an important agreement with a key supplier in California. The economic terms of the contract are favorable to you, so in your desire to close the deal, you instructed your lawyer not to worry too much about those boilerplate clauses at the back of the contract, and you did not include any clause indicating the forum in which any later disputes would be decided. After the post-closing honeymoon is over, a dispute emerges. While you are attempting to work it out with the supplier, it pre-emptively sues you in California, simply to gain home field advantage. You now face the prospect of having to obtain local counsel in California, deal with the unfamiliar rules there, and most importantly, your witnesses, and perhaps the better part of your management team, may well have to make multiple trips to California over the next couple of years to attend depositions and hearings and meet the other requirements of the case. The absence of a forum selection clause in your contract has not only guaranteed that you will have to deal with legal proceedings 3,000 miles away, but also has induced your counterparty to start a lawsuit even as negotiations were pending, simply to gain a tactical advantage in the event that negotiations fail. The hypothetical can be made even starker: imagine the supplier is not in California, but in a foreign country whose courts you do not trust to resolve your dispute fairly and efficiently and whose government may have close ties to your counterparty.
As these examples show, forum selection clauses provide several important benefits. First, they provide certainty. It can take untold expense and months of time to fight in two or more jurisdictions. A well-crafted forum selection clause will nip this in the bud and allow the parties to deal with the merits of their dispute without a prolonged and expensive procedural battle.
Second, forum selection clauses can make parties less trigger happy. If there is no forum selection clause in a contract, each side will have an incentive to race to the courthouse to lock in home field advantage as soon as a dispute arises. (Many courts apply the “first filed” rule under which the first-filed case will be permitted to take precedence.) The absence of a forum selection clause thus can impede the parties’ ability to negotiate their differences prior to the expense of filing a lawsuit.
Third, although all lawsuits are potentially costly, cases in inconvenient forums can impose costs and other problems that are particularly burdensome and unwelcome. If a case will involve multiple depositions, for example, the travel time and distraction of those depositions and the sheer distraction on management’s time could be a substantial deterrent to continuing the fight.
Fourth, not all courts are equal when it comes to expertise, experience, fairness and predictability. Many parties select forums such as Delaware or New York because the courts there have well understood rules and frequently deal with complex commercial disputes. More remote forums, and courts in other countries, may not be as familiar with standard commercial dealings or the customs and usages of the parties. Even when choosing among relatively sophisticated forums, local rules and procedures may vary in ways that matter a great deal to the outcome. Jury pools differ from place to place. And not every forum moves cases equally quickly. Some courts, particularly in foreign jurisdictions, can take many years to resolve even a basic commercial dispute. Failing to choose a forum that can resolve your dispute in an acceptable time frame can effectively deny you a forum altogether.
Things to Think About When Crafting Forum Selection Clauses
So a forum selection clause is an important part of any business contract. But what are the issues you need to keep in mind in crafting a forum selection clause? The following is a non-exhaustive list.
* * * * *
In the euphoria of signing a business deal, no one likes to think of the possibility of later lawsuits. But a few minutes of thought about a well-crafted forum selection clause can save months or years of anguish and inconvenience. Although there is no single “right forum” for all disputes, in most cases, the clearly wrong answer is not to address forum selection at all.
For more information about the contents of this alert, please contact:
Privacy & Data Security
© 2014 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved. This informational piece, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Goodwin Procter LLP, Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP or their attorneys. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcome.
Goodwin Procter LLP is a limited liability partnership which operates in the United States and has a principal law office located at 53 State Street, Boston, MA 02109. Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP is a separate limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC362294. Its registered office is at Tower 42, 25 Old Broad Street, London EC2N 1HQ. A list of the names of the members of Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP is available for inspection at the registered office. Goodwin Procter (UK) LLP is authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.