For more than 30 years, Mr. Giannotto has advised and litigated on behalf of numerous corporations and trade associations involved in hardrock mining, manufacturing and defense contracting in connection with all of the major federal environmental laws and their state analogues. These include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Clean Water Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, Toxic Substances Control Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know Act, and Federal Land Policy and Management Act.
Mr. Giannotto was part of a team that successfully litigated the first CERCLA case brought by a State to go to trial (Colorado v. Idarado Mining Company). He has represented the mining industry or individual mining companies in connection with every significant rulemaking by the EPA or the Department of the Interior, and every significant legislative proposal by the Congress, since the early 1980s relating to the environmental obligations or liabilities of hardrock mining companies.
Mr. Giannotto also has long litigated toxic tort and complex insurance matters. He has represented insurers in several mass tort bankruptcies and in numerous class- and mass-actions throughout the country alleging insurer bad faith. He has also litigated coverage disputes and disputes with governmental entities over reimbursement of insurance costs under the National Defense Projects Rating Plan. Mr. Giannotto's toxic tort cases have involved product-created toxic torts (such as asbestos-related injuries) as well as environmental toxic torts (such as releases to the environment from manufacturing facilities).
Mr. Giannotto’s significant clients include Newmont Mining Corporation, Mitsubishi/Mitsubishi Materials Corporation, CNA Financial, Resolute Management, Antofagasta Minerals, National Mining Association, Nevada Mining Association, United States Aviation Underwriters and Nevada Ready Mix Corporation.
Mr. Giannotto's recent matters include representing:
- A U.S. based multinational mining company in connection with enforcement proceedings initiated by EPA for alleged violations of the RCRA hazardous waste program in Nevada. This matter involves cutting-edge issues relating to the application of the RCRA Bevill Amendment to secondary streams from air pollution control facilities associated with beneficiation activities.
- A Fortune 50 multinational manufacturing company in connection with the investigation and remediation of a landfill site in upstate New York operated by an entity with which the client formerly did business.
- Mitsubishi Corporation and Mitsubishi Materials Corporation in connection with natural resources damages claims brought by the federal and New Mexico NRD Trustees arising out of a mining operation in New Mexico in which a Mitsubishi subsidiary was formerly a partner.
- Antofagasta Minerals (a Chilean mining company) in connection with the purchase and sale of contaminated property in Nevada undergoing reclamation pursuant to state and federal law.
- Several multinational companies and trade organizations in EPA rulemakings and other proceedings dealing with the Definition of Solid Waste under RCRA, legitimacy criteria that should be applied to recycling of wastes under Subtitle C of RCRA, the scope of EPA jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act and the need for increased financial assurance requirements for mining companies pursuant to Section 108(b) of CERCLA.
- Manufacturing companies with respect to their obligations under the SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rule, including setting up protocols to assure compliance.
- Mining and manufacturing clients in connection with proposed federal legislation, including (i) Congressional efforts to regulate management of mercury, including work on the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 and preparation of white papers for EPA with respect to MEBA, and (ii) proposed Mining Law Reform legislation and Good Samaritan legislation pending in the Congress.
- A major Comprehensive General Liability carrier in connection with the W.R. Grace bankruptcy, involving briefing and trial of objections to the proposed Grace plan of reorganization. Through negotiations with all relevant parties, potential coverage liability as well as liabilities arising out of over 1,000 “independent actions” brought against the carrier were resolved.
- A major CGL carrier in nationwide class action alleging bad faith and violations of Unfair Trade Practices Acts in connection with its settlements of thousands of asbestos cases nationwide, and in a separate mass action brought on behalf of hundreds of individuals claiming bad faith in connection with resolution of their asbestos claims in West Virginia.
- A major CGL carrier in the bankruptcy proceeding of an Ohio company facing potential mass tort liability due to alleged pollution emissions.
- A major CGL carrier in connection with three coverage actions by insureds deriving from hundreds of personal injury and property damage claims brought against the insureds due to alleged environmental contamination in three different counties of West Virginia.
- A major aviation workers compensation insurer and government contractor in government contracts lawsuit with U.S. relating to the National Defense Projects Rating Plan.